remove mutex_lock, mutex_unlock macros
[ust.git] / libust / buffers.c
index ac34e5fa5f3102de5fc93dd7c1833d586c578b6a..7b540de880ee68934c80fb8fb19d392b91beb180 100644 (file)
@@ -242,14 +242,14 @@ int ust_buffers_channel_open(struct ust_channel *chan, size_t subbuf_size, size_
 
        kref_init(&chan->kref);
 
-       mutex_lock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
+       pthread_mutex_lock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
        for(i=0; i<chan->n_cpus; i++) {
                result = ust_buffers_open_buf(chan, i);
                if (result == -1)
                        goto error;
        }
        list_add(&chan->list, &ust_buffers_channels);
-       mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
+       pthread_mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
 
        return 0;
 
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ error:
        }
 
        kref_put(&chan->kref, ust_buffers_destroy_channel);
-       mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
+       pthread_mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
        return -1;
 }
 
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ void ust_buffers_channel_close(struct ust_channel *chan)
        if(!chan)
                return;
 
-       mutex_lock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
+       pthread_mutex_lock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
        for(i=0; i<chan->n_cpus; i++) {
        /* FIXME: if we make it here, then all buffers were necessarily allocated. Moreover, we don't
         * initialize to NULL so we cannot use this check. Should we? */
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ void ust_buffers_channel_close(struct ust_channel *chan)
 
        list_del(&chan->list);
        kref_put(&chan->kref, ust_buffers_destroy_channel);
-       mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
+       pthread_mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
 }
 
 /*
This page took 0.02335 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.