From d47b05cb05b91bb9679d127c51bc4beac12b899d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:23:10 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix: urcu-qsbr: reversed logic on RCU_DEBUG

* Dmitri Shubin <sbn@tbricks.com> wrote:
> Shouldn't the condition in line 94 actually be
>
>      94  #if (!defined(BUILD_QSBR_LIB) && !defined(RCU_DEBUG))
>
> So when RCU_DEBUG is _not_ defined we get static inlines for
> rcu_read_{,un}lock() ?

Indeed!

Reported-by: Dmitri Shubin <sbn@tbricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
---
 urcu-qsbr.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/urcu-qsbr.h b/urcu-qsbr.h
index bb0523c..b4a28a7 100644
--- a/urcu-qsbr.h
+++ b/urcu-qsbr.h
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ extern "C" {
  * library debugging & tracing features we could come up with.
  */
 
-#if (!defined(BUILD_QSBR_LIB) && defined(RCU_DEBUG))
+#if (!defined(BUILD_QSBR_LIB) && !defined(RCU_DEBUG))
 
 static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
 {
-- 
2.34.1