Cleanup list command printout for loglevel
[lttng-tools.git] / doc / calibrate.txt
1 LTTng calibrate command documentation
2 Mathieu Desnoyers, August 6, 2011
4 The LTTng calibrate command can be used to find out the combined average
5 overhead of the LTTng tracer and the instrumentation mechanisms used.
6 This overhead can be calibrated in terms of time or using any of the PMU
7 performance counter available on the system.
9 For now, the only calibration implemented is that of the kernel function
10 instrumentation (kretprobes).
13 * Calibrate kernel function instrumentation
15 Let's use an example to show this calibration. We use an i7 processor
16 with 4 general-purpose PMU registers. This information is available by
17 issuing dmesg, looking for "generic registers".
19 This sequence of commands will gather a trace executing a kretprobe
20 hooked on an empty function, gathering PMU counters LLC (Last Level
21 Cache) misses information (see lttng add-context --help to see the list
22 of available PMU counters).
24 (as root)
25 lttng create calibrate-function
26 lttng enable-event calibrate --kernel --function lttng_calibrate_kretprobe
27 lttng add-context --kernel -t perf:LLC-load-misses -t perf:LLC-store-misses \
28 -t perf:LLC-prefetch-misses
29 lttng start
30 for a in $(seq 1 10); do \
31 lttng calibrate --kernel --function;
32 done
33 lttng destroy
34 babeltrace $(ls -1drt ~/lttng-traces/calibrate-function-* | tail -n 1)
36 The output from babeltrace can be saved to a text file and opened in a
37 spreadsheet (e.g. oocalc) to focus on the per-PMU counter delta between
38 consecutive "calibrate_entry" and "calibrate_return" events. Note that
39 these counters are per-CPU, so scheduling events would need to be
40 present to account for migration between CPU. Therefore, for calibration
41 purposes, only events staying on the same CPU must be considered.
43 The average result, for the i7, on 10 samples:
45 Average Std.Dev.
46 perf_LLC_load_misses: 5.0 0.577
47 perf_LLC_store_misses: 1.6 0.516
48 perf_LLC_prefetch_misses: 9.0 14.742
50 As we can notice, the load and store misses are relatively stable across
51 runs (their standard deviation is relatively low) compared to the
52 prefetch misses. We can conclude from this information that LLC load and
53 store misses can be accounted for quite precisely, but prefetches within
54 a function seems to behave too erratically (not much causality link
55 between the code executed and the CPU prefetch activity) to be accounted
56 for.
This page took 0.044534 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.