*/
if (((commit_count - chan->backend.subbuf_size)
& chan->commit_count_mask)
- - (buf_trunc(consumed_cur, chan)
+ - (buf_trunc(consumed, chan)
>> chan->backend.num_subbuf_order)
!= 0)
goto nodata;
* Check that we are not about to read the same subbuffer in
* which the writer head is.
*/
- if (subbuf_trunc(write_offset, chan) - subbuf_trunc(consumed_cur, chan)
+ if (subbuf_trunc(write_offset, chan) - subbuf_trunc(consumed, chan)
== 0)
goto nodata;
struct lttng_ust_lib_ring_buffer *buf,
struct channel *chan,
struct switch_offsets *offsets,
- uint64_t *tsc)
+ uint64_t *tsc,
+ struct lttng_ust_shm_handle *handle)
{
const struct lttng_ust_lib_ring_buffer_config *config = &chan->backend.config;
- unsigned long off;
+ unsigned long off, reserve_commit_diff;
offsets->begin = v_read(config, &buf->offset);
offsets->old = offsets->begin;
* timestamps) are visible to the reader. This is required for
* quiescence guarantees for the fusion merge.
*/
- if (mode == SWITCH_FLUSH || off > 0) {
- if (caa_unlikely(off == 0)) {
- /*
- * The client does not save any header information.
- * Don't switch empty subbuffer on finalize, because it
- * is invalid to deliver a completely empty subbuffer.
- */
- if (!config->cb.subbuffer_header_size())
+ if (mode != SWITCH_FLUSH && !off)
+ return -1; /* we do not have to switch : buffer is empty */
+
+ if (caa_unlikely(off == 0)) {
+ unsigned long sb_index, commit_count;
+
+ /*
+ * We are performing a SWITCH_FLUSH. At this stage, there are no
+ * concurrent writes into the buffer.
+ *
+ * The client does not save any header information. Don't
+ * switch empty subbuffer on finalize, because it is invalid to
+ * deliver a completely empty subbuffer.
+ */
+ if (!config->cb.subbuffer_header_size())
+ return -1;
+
+ /* Test new buffer integrity */
+ sb_index = subbuf_index(offsets->begin, chan);
+ commit_count = v_read(config,
+ &shmp_index(handle, buf->commit_cold,
+ sb_index)->cc_sb);
+ reserve_commit_diff =
+ (buf_trunc(offsets->begin, chan)
+ >> chan->backend.num_subbuf_order)
+ - (commit_count & chan->commit_count_mask);
+ if (caa_likely(reserve_commit_diff == 0)) {
+ /* Next subbuffer not being written to. */
+ if (caa_unlikely(config->mode != RING_BUFFER_OVERWRITE &&
+ subbuf_trunc(offsets->begin, chan)
+ - subbuf_trunc((unsigned long)
+ uatomic_read(&buf->consumed), chan)
+ >= chan->backend.buf_size)) {
+ /*
+ * We do not overwrite non consumed buffers
+ * and we are full : don't switch.
+ */
return -1;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Next subbuffer not being written to, and we
+ * are either in overwrite mode or the buffer is
+ * not full. It's safe to write in this new
+ * subbuffer.
+ */
+ }
+ } else {
/*
- * Need to write the subbuffer start header on finalize.
+ * Next subbuffer reserve offset does not match the
+ * commit offset. Don't perform switch in
+ * producer-consumer and overwrite mode. Caused by
+ * either a writer OOPS or too many nested writes over a
+ * reserve/commit pair.
*/
- offsets->switch_old_start = 1;
+ return -1;
}
- offsets->begin = subbuf_align(offsets->begin, chan);
- } else
- return -1; /* we do not have to switch : buffer is empty */
+
+ /*
+ * Need to write the subbuffer start header on finalize.
+ */
+ offsets->switch_old_start = 1;
+ }
+ offsets->begin = subbuf_align(offsets->begin, chan);
/* Note: old points to the next subbuf at offset 0 */
offsets->end = offsets->begin;
return 0;
*/
do {
if (lib_ring_buffer_try_switch_slow(mode, buf, chan, &offsets,
- &tsc))
+ &tsc, handle))
return; /* Switch not needed */
} while (v_cmpxchg(config, &buf->offset, offsets.old, offsets.end)
!= offsets.old);
{
const struct lttng_ust_lib_ring_buffer_config *config = &chan->backend.config;
struct lttng_ust_shm_handle *handle = ctx->handle;
- unsigned long reserve_commit_diff;
+ unsigned long reserve_commit_diff, offset_cmp;
- offsets->begin = v_read(config, &buf->offset);
+retry:
+ offsets->begin = offset_cmp = v_read(config, &buf->offset);
offsets->old = offsets->begin;
offsets->switch_new_start = 0;
offsets->switch_new_end = 0;
}
}
if (caa_unlikely(offsets->switch_new_start)) {
- unsigned long sb_index;
+ unsigned long sb_index, commit_count;
/*
* We are typically not filling the previous buffer completely.
+ config->cb.subbuffer_header_size();
/* Test new buffer integrity */
sb_index = subbuf_index(offsets->begin, chan);
+ /*
+ * Read buf->offset before buf->commit_cold[sb_index].cc_sb.
+ * lib_ring_buffer_check_deliver() has the matching
+ * memory barriers required around commit_cold cc_sb
+ * updates to ensure reserve and commit counter updates
+ * are not seen reordered when updated by another CPU.
+ */
+ cmm_smp_rmb();
+ commit_count = v_read(config,
+ &shmp_index(handle, buf->commit_cold,
+ sb_index)->cc_sb);
+ /* Read buf->commit_cold[sb_index].cc_sb before buf->offset. */
+ cmm_smp_rmb();
+ if (caa_unlikely(offset_cmp != v_read(config, &buf->offset))) {
+ /*
+ * The reserve counter have been concurrently updated
+ * while we read the commit counter. This means the
+ * commit counter we read might not match buf->offset
+ * due to concurrent update. We therefore need to retry.
+ */
+ goto retry;
+ }
reserve_commit_diff =
(buf_trunc(offsets->begin, chan)
>> chan->backend.num_subbuf_order)
- - ((unsigned long) v_read(config,
- &shmp_index(handle, buf->commit_cold, sb_index)->cc_sb)
- & chan->commit_count_mask);
+ - (commit_count & chan->commit_count_mask);
if (caa_likely(reserve_commit_diff == 0)) {
/* Next subbuffer not being written to. */
if (caa_unlikely(config->mode != RING_BUFFER_OVERWRITE &&
/*
* Next subbuffer reserve offset does not match the
- * commit offset. Drop record in producer-consumer and
+ * commit offset, and this did not involve update to the
+ * reserve counter. Drop record in producer-consumer and
* overwrite mode. Caused by either a writer OOPS or too
* many nested writes over a reserve/commit pair.
*/
projects / lttng-ust.git / blobdiff